5113f6f70
김현기
kernel add
|
1
2
3
4
5
6
7
8
9
10
11
12
13
14
15
16
17
18
19
20
21
22
23
24
25
26
27
28
29
30
31
32
33
34
35
36
37
38
39
40
41
42
43
44
45
46
47
48
49
50
51
52
53
54
55
56
57
58
59
60
61
62
63
64
65
66
67
68
69
70
71
72
73
74
75
76
77
78
79
80
81
82
83
84
85
86
87
88
89
90
91
92
93
94
95
96
97
98
99
100
101
102
103
104
105
106
107
108
109
110
111
112
113
114
115
116
117
118
119
120
121
122
123
124
125
126
127
128
129
130
131
132
133
134
135
136
137
138
139
140
141
142
143
144
145
146
147
148
149
150
151
152
153
154
155
156
157
158
159
160
161
162
163
164
165
166
167
168
169
170
171
172
173
174
175
176
177
178
179
180
181
182
183
184
185
186
187
188
189
190
191
192
193
194
195
196
197
198
199
200
201
202
203
204
205
206
207
208
209
210
211
212
|
/*
* Latched RB-trees
*
* Copyright (C) 2015 Intel Corp., Peter Zijlstra <peterz@infradead.org>
*
* Since RB-trees have non-atomic modifications they're not immediately suited
* for RCU/lockless queries. Even though we made RB-tree lookups non-fatal for
* lockless lookups; we cannot guarantee they return a correct result.
*
* The simplest solution is a seqlock + RB-tree, this will allow lockless
* lookups; but has the constraint (inherent to the seqlock) that read sides
* cannot nest in write sides.
*
* If we need to allow unconditional lookups (say as required for NMI context
* usage) we need a more complex setup; this data structure provides this by
* employing the latch technique -- see @raw_write_seqcount_latch -- to
* implement a latched RB-tree which does allow for unconditional lookups by
* virtue of always having (at least) one stable copy of the tree.
*
* However, while we have the guarantee that there is at all times one stable
* copy, this does not guarantee an iteration will not observe modifications.
* What might have been a stable copy at the start of the iteration, need not
* remain so for the duration of the iteration.
*
* Therefore, this does require a lockless RB-tree iteration to be non-fatal;
* see the comment in lib/rbtree.c. Note however that we only require the first
* condition -- not seeing partial stores -- because the latch thing isolates
* us from loops. If we were to interrupt a modification the lookup would be
* pointed at the stable tree and complete while the modification was halted.
*/
#ifndef RB_TREE_LATCH_H
#define RB_TREE_LATCH_H
#include <linux/rbtree.h>
#include <linux/seqlock.h>
struct latch_tree_node {
struct rb_node node[2];
};
struct latch_tree_root {
seqcount_t seq;
struct rb_root tree[2];
};
/**
* latch_tree_ops - operators to define the tree order
* @less: used for insertion; provides the (partial) order between two elements.
* @comp: used for lookups; provides the order between the search key and an element.
*
* The operators are related like:
*
* comp(a->key,b) < 0 := less(a,b)
* comp(a->key,b) > 0 := less(b,a)
* comp(a->key,b) == 0 := !less(a,b) && !less(b,a)
*
* If these operators define a partial order on the elements we make no
* guarantee on which of the elements matching the key is found. See
* latch_tree_find().
*/
struct latch_tree_ops {
bool (*less)(struct latch_tree_node *a, struct latch_tree_node *b);
int (*comp)(void *key, struct latch_tree_node *b);
};
static __always_inline struct latch_tree_node *
__lt_from_rb(struct rb_node *node, int idx)
{
return container_of(node, struct latch_tree_node, node[idx]);
}
static __always_inline void
__lt_insert(struct latch_tree_node *ltn, struct latch_tree_root *ltr, int idx,
bool (*less)(struct latch_tree_node *a, struct latch_tree_node *b))
{
struct rb_root *root = <r->tree[idx];
struct rb_node **link = &root->rb_node;
struct rb_node *node = <n->node[idx];
struct rb_node *parent = NULL;
struct latch_tree_node *ltp;
while (*link) {
parent = *link;
ltp = __lt_from_rb(parent, idx);
if (less(ltn, ltp))
link = &parent->rb_left;
else
link = &parent->rb_right;
}
rb_link_node_rcu(node, parent, link);
rb_insert_color(node, root);
}
static __always_inline void
__lt_erase(struct latch_tree_node *ltn, struct latch_tree_root *ltr, int idx)
{
rb_erase(<n->node[idx], <r->tree[idx]);
}
static __always_inline struct latch_tree_node *
__lt_find(void *key, struct latch_tree_root *ltr, int idx,
int (*comp)(void *key, struct latch_tree_node *node))
{
struct rb_node *node = rcu_dereference_raw(ltr->tree[idx].rb_node);
struct latch_tree_node *ltn;
int c;
while (node) {
ltn = __lt_from_rb(node, idx);
c = comp(key, ltn);
if (c < 0)
node = rcu_dereference_raw(node->rb_left);
else if (c > 0)
node = rcu_dereference_raw(node->rb_right);
else
return ltn;
}
return NULL;
}
/**
* latch_tree_insert() - insert @node into the trees @root
* @node: nodes to insert
* @root: trees to insert @node into
* @ops: operators defining the node order
*
* It inserts @node into @root in an ordered fashion such that we can always
* observe one complete tree. See the comment for raw_write_seqcount_latch().
*
* The inserts use rcu_assign_pointer() to publish the element such that the
* tree structure is stored before we can observe the new @node.
*
* All modifications (latch_tree_insert, latch_tree_remove) are assumed to be
* serialized.
*/
static __always_inline void
latch_tree_insert(struct latch_tree_node *node,
struct latch_tree_root *root,
const struct latch_tree_ops *ops)
{
raw_write_seqcount_latch(&root->seq);
__lt_insert(node, root, 0, ops->less);
raw_write_seqcount_latch(&root->seq);
__lt_insert(node, root, 1, ops->less);
}
/**
* latch_tree_erase() - removes @node from the trees @root
* @node: nodes to remote
* @root: trees to remove @node from
* @ops: operators defining the node order
*
* Removes @node from the trees @root in an ordered fashion such that we can
* always observe one complete tree. See the comment for
* raw_write_seqcount_latch().
*
* It is assumed that @node will observe one RCU quiescent state before being
* reused of freed.
*
* All modifications (latch_tree_insert, latch_tree_remove) are assumed to be
* serialized.
*/
static __always_inline void
latch_tree_erase(struct latch_tree_node *node,
struct latch_tree_root *root,
const struct latch_tree_ops *ops)
{
raw_write_seqcount_latch(&root->seq);
__lt_erase(node, root, 0);
raw_write_seqcount_latch(&root->seq);
__lt_erase(node, root, 1);
}
/**
* latch_tree_find() - find the node matching @key in the trees @root
* @key: search key
* @root: trees to search for @key
* @ops: operators defining the node order
*
* Does a lockless lookup in the trees @root for the node matching @key.
*
* It is assumed that this is called while holding the appropriate RCU read
* side lock.
*
* If the operators define a partial order on the elements (there are multiple
* elements which have the same key value) it is undefined which of these
* elements will be found. Nor is it possible to iterate the tree to find
* further elements with the same key value.
*
* Returns: a pointer to the node matching @key or NULL.
*/
static __always_inline struct latch_tree_node *
latch_tree_find(void *key, struct latch_tree_root *root,
const struct latch_tree_ops *ops)
{
struct latch_tree_node *node;
unsigned int seq;
do {
seq = raw_read_seqcount_latch(&root->seq);
node = __lt_find(key, root, seq & 1, ops->comp);
} while (read_seqcount_retry(&root->seq, seq));
return node;
}
#endif /* RB_TREE_LATCH_H */
|